Suzuki Wagon R MOT Results
Registered in 199842.1% pass rate
from 57 tests in 2021
(56% worse than other 1998 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Wagon R is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
30% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
28% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 25% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
28% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
30% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
25% fail on
Suspension
- 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.8% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.5% fail on Washers
- 1.8% fail on Bonnet
-
7.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
-
1.8% fail on
Steering play
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack
-
3.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.8% fail on
Chassis
- 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth