Suzuki Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 201787.8% pass rate
from 11,540 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Washers (44% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.026% fail on
View to rear
- 0.026% fail on Mirrors
-
0.017% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.017% fail on Windscreen
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth (97% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.0087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.087% fail on
Headlamps
(83% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.061% fail on
Direction indicators
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.061% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.017% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0087% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0087% fail on Horn
-
0.017% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.017% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0087% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.0087% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
0.0087% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.0087% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Brakes
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.13% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(62% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0087% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0087% fail on Linkage
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.48% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.0087% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.069% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.035% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.035% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.026% fail on
Rbt
- 0.0087% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0087% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0087% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0087% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.026% fail on
Rbt
- 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.069% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.061% fail on Pedal
- 0.0087% fail on Hand lever
- 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.017% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.017% fail on Lever
-
0.017% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0087% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0087% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.017% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0087% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.017% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0087% fail on Linkage
- 0.035% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.035% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.017% fail on
Springs
(95% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover (16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(68% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(70% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.026% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0087% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0087% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.026% fail on
Compression ignition
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(52% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Transmission
-
0.061% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.061% fail on Joints
-
0.061% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.035% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.017% fail on
Body
- 0.017% fail on Other body component
- 0.0087% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0087% fail on
Doors
-
0.0087% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0087% fail on Hinge
-
0.0087% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.0087% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.0087% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.0087% fail on Undertray
-
0.061% fail on
Transmission
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.069% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.052% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Requirements
- 0.052% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.0087% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0087% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.069% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.0087% fail on Condition
-
0.087% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(58% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Registration plates (58% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Steering
-
0.043% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.026% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0087% fail on Track rod end
-
0.017% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
-
0.017% fail on
Steering play
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
-
0.043% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.0087% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0087% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Vitara (2015 on)
Spacious interior. Feels like it's built to last. Economical engines including hybrid power from 2022.