Suzuki Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 200050.9% pass rate
from 448 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.3% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Tell tale
- 0.22% fail on Switch
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(35% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Parking brake performance (94% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Front wheels
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake operation
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(68% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Components
(66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Pipes (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Hoses
- 0.45% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.22% fail on Valves
- 0.67% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Leaks
-
10% fail on
Components
(66% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.45% fail on Brake discs
- 0.22% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake control components
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.45% fail on Cable
- 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(28% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.45% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.22% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Condition (28 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(59% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.45% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
-
1.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Front
- 0.67% fail on Rear
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (68% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.22% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 5.8% fail on Emissions
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.45% fail on Pipe
- 0.45% fail on System
- 0.22% fail on Cap
-
13% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
- 0.89% fail on Passengers front (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Drivers
- 0.89% fail on Body security (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passengers
-
8.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.45% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
-
6.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(97% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Steering
-
4.0% fail on
Steering system
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.45% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Drag link end
-
0.22% fail on
Other components
- 0.22% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.45% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Steering operation
-
4.0% fail on
Steering system
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
(56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.67% fail on
Towbars
- 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)