Suzuki Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 199957.5% pass rate
from 292 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.34% fail on Horn
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.34% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.34% fail on Brake linings
-
0.34% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.34% fail on Brake drums
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.0% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.0% fail on Lever
-
1.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Reservoirs (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.34% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.7% fail on Joints
-
0.34% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.34% fail on Joints
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
(8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.68% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
(8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Body
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Other body component (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Mounting fixings (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Chassis
- 0.68% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.68% fail on
Cabs
- 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Bumpers
- 0.34% fail on Floor
-
5.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
- 5.1% fail on Washers
-
7.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.68% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
7.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Suspension
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.4% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.34% fail on
Springs
- 0.34% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
- 0.34% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.68% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.34% fail on Track rod end
- 0.34% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Pump
-
0.68% fail on
Steering linkage components