Suzuki Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 199852.3% pass rate
from 283 tests in 2021
(24% worse than other 1998 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(95% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(93% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp (97% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Horn
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.35% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.35% fail on Switch
- 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
-
7.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(52% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(69% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(94% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.35% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
-
4.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.71% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.71% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(94% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.35% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.35% fail on Brake drums
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Other braking system component
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.35% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.35% fail on Load sensing valves
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(69% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
- 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint
- 0.35% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.71% fail on
Springs
- 0.71% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.71% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.35% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.35% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(58% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.2% fail on
Transmission
-
2.1% fail on
Prop shafts
(9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Joints (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.1% fail on Joints
- 0.35% fail on Halfshafts
-
2.1% fail on
Prop shafts
(9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
- 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
-
2.1% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.71% fail on Pipe
- 0.71% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 1.1% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Body
- 0.35% fail on Body condition
- 0.35% fail on Other body component
-
0.71% fail on
Seats
- 0.71% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.35% fail on Floor
-
0.35% fail on
Cabs
- 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.35% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
9.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.35% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
9.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.5% fail on
Visibility
- 6.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 0.71% fail on Bonnet
-
0.71% fail on
Condition of glass
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Windscreen (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
-
8.8% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.71% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint
- 0.35% fail on Drag link end
- 0.35% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
0.71% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.71% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Power steering
- 0.35% fail on Operation
- 0.35% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.35% fail on Steering wheel
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
1.1% fail on
Tyres
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Tread depth
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Condition