Suzuki Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 199363.0% pass rate
from 92 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1993 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
5.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
- 5.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 1.1% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 1993 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Pedal
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.1% fail on Valves
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.1% fail on
Semaphore
- 1.1% fail on Switch
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.3% fail on Battery(ies)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
5.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.3% fail on Joints
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
2.2% fail on
Body
- 1.1% fail on Mounting fixings
- 1.1% fail on Other body component
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.1% fail on Pipe
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 1.1% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.6% fail on
Steering
-
6.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 5.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
3.3% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 1993 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pump (39 times worse than other 1993 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Operation
- 2.2% fail on Steering wheel (27 times worse than other 1993 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
7.6% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension
- 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth