MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » SX4 » 2016

Suzuki SX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.7% pass rate
from 3,438 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki SX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.1% fail on Visibility (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Washers
    • 0.087% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.087% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.029% fail on View to rear
      • 0.029% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.76% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.058% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Horn
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.087% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.087% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.029% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.2% fail on Brakes
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (32% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.93% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.058% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.029% fail on Rbt
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.058% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.058% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.029% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.029% fail on Lever
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.32% fail on Suspension (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Springs (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.058% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.26% fail on Steering
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Drag link end (24 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.029% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.029% fail on Steering play
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.26% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.087% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.087% fail on Spark ignition (81% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.087% fail on Body, chassis, structure (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.029% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.029% fail on System
    • 0.029% fail on Doors
      • 0.029% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition
  • 0.058% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.058% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages