Suzuki SX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.9% pass rate
from 2,309 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki SX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Location
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.78% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
  • 9.2% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.043% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.043% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.043% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.043% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.043% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.087% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.087% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.087% fail on Pedal
        • 0.087% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.087% fail on ABS
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.043% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.043% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Valve stem (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on System
      • 0.043% fail on Cap
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.087% fail on Condition
  • 0.39% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.30% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.26% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.087% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment
  • 0.30% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.17% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers
    • 0.043% fail on Body security
  • 0.22% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages