Suzuki SX4 MOT Results
Registered in 200953.3% pass rate
from 2,421 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki SX4 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(70% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Springs
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Linkage
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.041% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.45% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.41% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.041% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.41% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.083% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.083% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Springs
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(68% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
(89% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(71% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(74% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(74% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.54% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.78% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.78% fail on Brake discs
-
0.17% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.17% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.17% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.083% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.21% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.041% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.041% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.041% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.041% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.041% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.8% fail on
Brake performance
(89% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(20% better than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (43% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Flashing type
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.25% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.25% fail on Horn
-
0.12% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
-
8.6% fail on
Visibility
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
-
0.083% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.083% fail on Windscreen
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(59% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.041% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.041% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.041% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.041% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.041% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.041% fail on Other leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(59% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.70% fail on
Transmission
(63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Drive shafts
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Joints (66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.083% fail on Joints
-
0.62% fail on
Drive shafts
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Tank
- 0.041% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.041% fail on System
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Door condition (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.083% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.083% fail on Bracket (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Body
- 0.083% fail on Other body component
- 0.041% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.083% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.083% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.083% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.083% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.083% fail on
Seats
- 0.083% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.50% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.25% fail on Condition
- 0.083% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Requirements
-
0.62% fail on
Steering
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Ball joint
-
0.041% fail on
Other components
- 0.041% fail on Steering component
-
0.21% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.041% fail on Operation
-
0.041% fail on
Power steering
- 0.041% fail on Operation
-
0.37% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
0.21% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.21% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review