Suzuki SX4 MOT Results
Registered in 200649.6% pass rate
from 1,420 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki SX4 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(60% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
16% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
16% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 16% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.35% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint
- 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 0.070% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.070% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.77% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.63% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.070% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.21% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.070% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.070% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(54% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(55% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (68% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.070% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.070% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(55% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.99% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
- 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.070% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(54% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.14% fail on Brake linings (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.070% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.070% fail on Lever
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.70% fail on Lever
-
0.35% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.070% fail on Valves
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.070% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.070% fail on Operation
-
0.070% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.070% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.85% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.070% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.070% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Other leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(20% better than other 2006 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
(54% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.99% fail on
Direction indicators
(62% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Flashing type
(62% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators (65% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.99% fail on
Flashing type
(62% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(68% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.070% fail on Horn
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
-
0.070% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.070% fail on Switch
- 0.070% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Wipers (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Bonnet
-
7.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.7% fail on
Transmission
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.5% fail on Joints
-
0.28% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.28% fail on Joints
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.63% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.42% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Hose
- 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.070% fail on System
-
0.28% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Other body component
- 0.070% fail on Panel
- 0.070% fail on Bumpers
-
0.070% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.070% fail on Bracket
-
0.070% fail on
Seats
- 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.070% fail on Size/type
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(53% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.92% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.77% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.70% fail on Registration plates
- 0.070% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment
- 0.070% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.070% fail on Steering rack
-
0.28% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2006 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki SX4 (2006 - 2014)
Reasonably spacious five-seater with a decent boot, strong and economical diesel, tidy handling in 4WD.