Suzuki Swift MOT Results
Registered in 201272.7% pass rate
from 9,386 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(11% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(30% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (78% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Direction indicators
(50% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Flashing type
(50% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators (44% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.043% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.84% fail on
Flashing type
(50% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
(70% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.075% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.18% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.075% fail on Position lamp
-
0.053% fail on
Reversing lamps
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Reversing lamps (72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.4% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
(24% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.043% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (32% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.011% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.011% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.021% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.011% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.011% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(30% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (41% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Brake linings
-
0.99% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.97% fail on Brake discs
- 0.021% fail on Brake drums
-
0.021% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.011% fail on Lever
- 0.011% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(150% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.075% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.032% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.021% fail on Master cylinder (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.032% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.011% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.011% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
6.1% fail on
Visibility
(37% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (47% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.075% fail on Bonnet
-
0.053% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.053% fail on Windscreen
- 0.011% fail on Driver's view
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
(15% better than other 2012 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
(65% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (66% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints (56% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.021% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.011% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
0.96% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (46% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.82% fail on
Springs
(81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
(81% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.043% fail on Shock absorbers (92% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Other suspension component
(86% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.011% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.95% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions (63% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.011% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.011% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.27% fail on
Compression ignition
(62% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.032% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (86% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.60% fail on
Spark ignition
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.86% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Joints (89% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.011% fail on Joints
-
0.12% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Bumpers
-
0.064% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.032% fail on Pipe
- 0.011% fail on Hose
- 0.011% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.011% fail on System
-
0.064% fail on
Body
- 0.053% fail on Other body component
- 0.011% fail on Panel
-
0.043% fail on
Doors
(70% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.032% fail on Door condition
-
0.011% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.011% fail on Catch
-
0.032% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.021% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.021% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.021% fail on
Seats
- 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.011% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.30% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.30% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Attachment
- 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.085% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
(90% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Ball joint
- 0.011% fail on Steering arm
- 0.011% fail on Locking devices
-
0.011% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.011% fail on Steering rack
-
0.011% fail on
Steering play
- 0.011% fail on Steering rack
-
0.14% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Condition
- 0.043% fail on Attachment (85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Swift (2010 - 2017)
Excellent equipment across the range, great fun to drive regardless of the engine, sport version is huge fun, 4x4 is great for rural areas.