Suzuki Swift MOT Results
Registered in 201070.2% pass rate
from 6,296 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Rear wheels (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Brake operation
- 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Components
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pipes (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Hoses
- 0.032% fail on Cylinders (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Operation
- 0.032% fail on Leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Components
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
- 0.032% fail on Wheel cylinder (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Restricted movement (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Service brake control components
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Pedal
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Anti-slip (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Pedal
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.095% fail on ABS
- 0.079% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.016% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.016% fail on Lever
-
0.016% fail on
Full power hydraulic systems
- 0.016% fail on Warning
-
0.016% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.016% fail on
Components
- 0.016% fail on Pipes
-
0.016% fail on
Components
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Rear lamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on All position lamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.016% fail on Switch
-
0.56% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.016% fail on Switch
-
0.41% fail on
Direction indicators
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Individual lamps (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.016% fail on Tell tales
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.11% fail on Battery
- 0.032% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.016% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.016% fail on Lamp
- 0.016% fail on Tell tale
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Washers (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Windscreen
- 0.079% fail on Bonnet
- 0.048% fail on Mirrors
- 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(83% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.016% fail on Attachment
- 0.016% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Shock absorbers
(48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Wheel bearings
(68% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Rear (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Front
-
0.17% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Constant velocity joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Couplings
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.048% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.048% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.032% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.016% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.016% fail on Condition
-
0.016% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.016% fail on Attachment
- 0.016% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(83% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Valve stem (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
0.95% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Exhaust system (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Emissions
-
0.13% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.064% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.064% fail on System
- 0.095% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.25% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.24% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.35% fail on
Steering
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Steering rack
- 0.032% fail on Steering arm
-
0.032% fail on
Other components
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Steering pivot point (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Free play
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
- 0.016% fail on Drag link end
- 0.016% fail on Track rod end
- 0.048% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Power steering
- 0.016% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.016% fail on Operation
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate
-
0.25% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.064% fail on
Seats
- 0.064% fail on Drivers
-
0.048% fail on
Doors
- 0.048% fail on Passengers other
- 0.032% fail on Body security
-
0.064% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Condition
- 0.016% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review