Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 2010
63.6% pass rate
from 7,251 tests in 2020
(6.6% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.083% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Rod
        • 0.014% fail on Cable
        • 0.014% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Master cylinder (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Servos
      • 0.014% fail on Valves
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-lock braking system (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.069% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.041% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.028% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.014% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.014% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.055% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.55% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.014% fail on Switch
      • 0.014% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.014% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Horn
    • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Main beam tell-tale (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.014% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.041% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joints (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.055% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.95% fail on Shock absorbers (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.041% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.028% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.083% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.083% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.083% fail on View to rear
      • 0.083% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.069% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (12% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.23% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.097% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.041% fail on Pipe
      • 0.028% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.028% fail on System
    • 0.083% fail on Seats
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.014% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.055% fail on Body
      • 0.041% fail on Other body component
      • 0.014% fail on Body condition
    • 0.028% fail on Doors (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
    • 0.014% fail on Towbar
      • 0.014% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.014% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.014% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
        • 0.014% fail on Steering component
    • 0.083% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.083% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.069% fail on Power steering
      • 0.055% fail on Operation
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
    • 0.055% fail on Steering play
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.028% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.39% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Seat belts (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates (47% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.028% fail on Attachment (90% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages