Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.2% pass rate
from 6,296 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Rear wheels (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Hoses
        • 0.032% fail on Cylinders (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
      • 0.032% fail on Leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.032% fail on Wheel cylinder (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake control components (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 0.095% fail on ABS
    • 0.079% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.016% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.016% fail on Lever
    • 0.016% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.016% fail on Warning
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Components
        • 0.016% fail on Pipes
  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Rear lamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.016% fail on Switch
    • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.54% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.016% fail on Switch
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Individual lamps (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.016% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
    • 0.032% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.016% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.016% fail on Lamp
      • 0.016% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 6.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.048% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Anti-roll bars (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Constant velocity joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Couplings
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.048% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.016% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 0.016% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Valve stem (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 0.95% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Exhaust system (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.064% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on System
    • 0.095% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.43% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.24% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 0.35% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering system (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.048% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.032% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.032% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Steering pivot point (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Free play
        • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.016% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.048% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Power steering
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
  • 0.35% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.064% fail on Seats
      • 0.064% fail on Drivers
    • 0.048% fail on Doors
      • 0.048% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.032% fail on Body security
  • 0.064% fail on Road Wheels (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.016% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages