Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.4% pass rate
from 1,352 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.074% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Battery
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts (51% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.074% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Rear (89% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Location
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.074% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (31% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Components
        • 6.4% fail on Pipes (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Hoses
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.30% fail on Valves
        • 0.074% fail on Servos
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.074% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.074% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (42 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on ABS
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.44% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Emissions (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Cap
      • 0.15% fail on System
      • 0.074% fail on Hose
      • 0.074% fail on Pipe
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.074% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.074% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.074% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 6.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.74% fail on Passengers front (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Drivers
      • 0.074% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers
    • 0.074% fail on Body security
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering system (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack (84% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.074% fail on Locking devices

Search Good Garages