Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 2000
41.6% pass rate
from 416 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.72% fail on Spring mounting
    • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 6.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.24% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.24% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Front
    • 3.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.24% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.72% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.24% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.48% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.7% fail on Battery
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Horn
  • 23% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.9% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.24% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (62% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Components (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Pipes (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Hoses
        • 0.24% fail on Valves
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.48% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Emissions
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.96% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Pipe
      • 0.48% fail on Cap
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Wipers (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.96% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers front (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Body security (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 8.7% fail on Tread depth (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.24% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.48% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.48% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages