Suzuki Swift MOT Results
Registered in 199950.2% pass rate
from 267 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 14% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.75% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.37% fail on Couplings
-
4.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.5% fail on Rear
- 0.37% fail on Front
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.75% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Location
-
0.37% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.37% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Front suspension joints
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Battery
- 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.37% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.37% fail on Switch
-
7.9% fail on
Position lamps
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.2% fail on Front wheels
- 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.4% fail on
Components
- 5.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.37% fail on Hoses
- 0.37% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.5% fail on Leaks
- 0.75% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Components
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.37% fail on Brake discs
- 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.37% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.37% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.6% fail on Emissions
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.75% fail on System
- 0.37% fail on Cap
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 8.6% fail on Tread depth (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.75% fail on Valve stem (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
7.9% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
7.9% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 4.5% fail on Body condition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Chassis
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
- 1.1% fail on Passengers other
-
6.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.37% fail on Bonnet
- 0.37% fail on Windscreen
- 0.37% fail on Mirrors
-
0.75% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Steering system
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Steering rack
- 0.37% fail on Track rod end
-
0.75% fail on
Steering system
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.75% fail on Registration plate