Suzuki Swift MOT Results
Registered in 199951.3% pass rate
from 80 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
- 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(93% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 7.5% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Drive shaft
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.5% fail on
Chassis
- 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
- 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 6.3% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
10% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates