Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 1997
56.2% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.4% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pedal (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.4% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 9.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 9.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Transmission
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.5% fail on Joints
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.4% fail on Floor
  • 8.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
      • 1.4% fail on Pump
  • 1.4% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages