Suzuki Splash MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.6% pass rate
from 1,619 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Splash is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.56% fail on Other suspension component (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.062% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.062% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Brakes (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt
          • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.062% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.99% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.062% fail on Linkage
    • 0.74% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pedal
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.062% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.93% fail on Position lamps (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Position lamp (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.062% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.062% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.062% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.25% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.062% fail on Doors
      • 0.062% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition
    • 0.062% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.062% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Compression ignition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.062% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.062% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.62% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Requirements
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Drag link end
  • 0.062% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.062% fail on Doors
      • 0.062% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
  • 0.062% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Splash (2008 - 2014)
    Small yet tall five-door city car. High seating position. Rear seats fold flat. Auto is 4-speed torque converter. Highest first time MoT pass rate of any car.

    Search Good Garages