MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Splash » 2010

Suzuki Splash MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.6% pass rate
from 1,575 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Splash is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Mounting
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.063% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.063% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.95% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.063% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.76% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.063% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.95% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.063% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.063% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
    • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.063% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.063% fail on Joints
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
        • 0.063% fail on Catch
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.063% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.063% fail on Pipe
    • 0.063% fail on Body
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Compression ignition (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.063% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.63% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.063% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.44% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.063% fail on Power steering
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
  • 0.063% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.063% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Splash (2008 - 2014)
    Small yet tall five-door city car. High seating position. Rear seats fold flat. Auto is 4-speed torque converter. Highest first time MoT pass rate of any car.

    Search Good Garages