Suzuki Splash MOT Results
Registered in 200957.1% pass rate
from 2,852 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Splash is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Springs
(80% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Coil springs
(81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Coil spring (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Mounting
-
10% fail on
Coil springs
(81% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.070% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.67% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
-
2.5% fail on
Macpherson strut
(12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.32% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.070% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.070% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Springs
(80% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(90% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.070% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.070% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.070% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.035% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.035% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.77% fail on Brake discs
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.070% fail on Cable
- 0.035% fail on Lever
-
0.77% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
0.070% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.035% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.035% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.070% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.070% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
- 0.035% fail on Driver's view
-
0.035% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.035% fail on Windscreen
-
0.035% fail on
View to rear
- 0.035% fail on Mirrors
-
7.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.035% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Headlamps
(77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.28% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.035% fail on Horn
-
0.14% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(27% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(26% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.67% fail on
Transmission
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Joints (63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.21% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
- 0.035% fail on Hinge
-
0.21% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.18% fail on
Boot lid
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.035% fail on Pipe
-
0.070% fail on
Body
- 0.070% fail on Other body component
-
0.035% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.035% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.035% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.035% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.035% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.035% fail on Carrier
-
0.035% fail on
Load security
-
0.035% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.035% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.035% fail on
Tailgate
-
2.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.035% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.035% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.70% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.070% fail on Requirements
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.53% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint
-
0.11% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
-
0.035% fail on
Power steering
- 0.035% fail on Operation
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.46% fail on Registration plates
-
0.035% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.035% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Splash (2008 - 2014)
Small yet tall five-door city car. High seating position. Rear seats fold flat. Auto is 4-speed torque converter. Highest first time MoT pass rate of any car.