Suzuki Liana MOT Results
Registered in 200451.2% pass rate
from 1,257 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Liana is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 18% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Couplings
- 0.080% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.16% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
-
18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.080% fail on Linkage condition
-
4.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 0.080% fail on Location
-
2.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Front (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Rear
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.24% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.24% fail on
Shock absorbers
(84% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.080% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.080% fail on Condition
-
0.080% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.080% fail on Condition
-
0.080% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.080% fail on Subframe mounting
-
18% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% better than other 2004 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.40% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.080% fail on All position lamps
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(68% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Individual lamps (87% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.080% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.48% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Battery
- 0.080% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(47% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(54% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Pipes (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Cylinders
- 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.080% fail on Hoses
- 0.40% fail on Leaks
-
7.4% fail on
Components
(54% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
(49% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
- 0.16% fail on Wheel cylinder (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on ABS
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.080% fail on Cable
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(47% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(24% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Size/type
-
7.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.080% fail on Bonnet
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.6% fail on Emissions
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.64% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.24% fail on Tank
- 0.16% fail on Pipe
- 0.16% fail on System
- 0.080% fail on Cap
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.72% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Requirements
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.080% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Steering system
(89% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.080% fail on Rams
- 0.080% fail on Other components
- 0.24% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Steering control
- 0.080% fail on Steering column
-
0.48% fail on
Steering system
(89% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.40% fail on Body condition
-
0.40% fail on
Doors
- 0.40% fail on Passengers other
- 0.080% fail on Body security
-
0.080% fail on
Load security
- 0.080% fail on Bootlid
-
0.95% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.95% fail on Registration plate
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
-
0.080% fail on
Towbars
- 0.080% fail on Towbar