Suzuki Liana MOT Results
Registered in 200349.0% pass rate
from 884 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Liana is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(46% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
19% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 18% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Couplings
-
0.34% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
18% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Location
-
2.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Prescribed areas
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Component mounting (86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.11% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
19% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Rear wheels (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.11% fail on Brake operation
-
8.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.6% fail on
Components
- 6.9% fail on Pipes (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Cylinders
- 0.11% fail on Hoses
- 0.11% fail on Valves
- 0.68% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
7.6% fail on
Components
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.45% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Brake drums
- 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.68% fail on ABS
- 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Position lamps
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps (40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Rear lamps (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Battery
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 7.7% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Size/type
- 0.23% fail on Valve stem
-
9.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.1% fail on Wipers (39% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Mirrors
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.0% fail on Emissions (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Cap
-
2.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.34% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
1.8% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
0.23% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.11% fail on Other components
- 0.23% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.79% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Body condition
- 0.11% fail on Body security
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
- 0.11% fail on Passengers other
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
- 0.11% fail on Access panel
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment