Suzuki Liana MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.0% pass rate
from 884 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Liana is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 19% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 18% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 18% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
      • 0.34% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Location
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Component mounting (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear wheels (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 8.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 6.9% fail on Pipes (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.11% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Valves
      • 0.68% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on ABS
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear lamps (64% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.7% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
    • 0.23% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (39% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Emissions (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.79% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (64% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Access panel
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages