Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2017
86.9% pass rate
from 974 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Washers
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Suspension (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Springs (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Coil springs (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Axles (119 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (53 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on King pins (1779 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Swivel joints/housing (2373 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.10% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
  • 1.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 1.4% fail on Brakes
    • 0.82% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Mechanical brake components (72% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Brake pads (83% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.21% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.51% fail on Tyres (85% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Tread depth (87% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Steering
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (42 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.10% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.10% fail on Transmission
      • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
  • 0.10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.10% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages