Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2016
90.4% pass rate
from 1,092 tests in 2020
(22% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (86% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.37% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.092% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.18% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.092% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.092% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 1.7% fail on Suspension (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Axles (389 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (256 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on King pins (1628 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Axle
      • 0.092% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.27% fail on Springs
      • 0.27% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.27% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.092% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 1.4% fail on Brakes
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.092% fail on Rbt
          • 0.092% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.092% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.37% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.092% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.092% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.37% fail on Tyres (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Tread depth (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.092% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.092% fail on Bumpers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages