Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2010
81.3% pass rate
from 616 tests in 2017
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Valves
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.81% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.16% fail on Components
        • 0.16% fail on Pipes
  • 5.0% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Axles (158 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Swivel joints/housing (228 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on King pins (441 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.65% fail on Front
      • 0.16% fail on Rear
    • 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 4.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 3.2% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.81% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plate lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Battery
    • 0.32% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.16% fail on Stop lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.81% fail on Steering
    • 0.65% fail on Steering system
      • 0.32% fail on Other components (65 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Steering pivot point (98 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.16% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.81% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Emissions
    • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.32% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages