Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.4% pass rate
from 725 tests in 2020
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.83% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Valves
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension
    • 5.7% fail on Springs
      • 5.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.3% fail on Axles (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Swivel joints/housing (531 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on King pins (398 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Axle
    • 0.69% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.41% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.41% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension arms (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 2.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.83% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
    • 0.14% fail on Chassis
      • 0.14% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar
      • 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.14% fail on Transmission
      • 0.14% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Joints
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.28% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.83% fail on Steering
    • 0.41% fail on Steering linkage components (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Pump
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages