Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2009
75.8% pass rate
from 858 tests in 2020
(36% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (30% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (34% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Cable (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.1% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Springs (39% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs (39% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Axles (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on King pins (637 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Swivel joints/housing (267 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component (13% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (6.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Headlamps (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.12% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Chassis (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Chassis condition (35 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Bracket (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.12% fail on Transmission
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.12% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Catalyst emissions (30% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Fluid leaks (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Transmission oil leaks (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates (3.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.47% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering box
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.12% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages