Suzuki Jimny MOT Results
Registered in 200974.5% pass rate
from 884 tests in 2021
(37% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.
-
8.4% fail on
Brakes
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
0.79% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
- 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.11% fail on Brake linings
-
0.90% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.79% fail on Brake discs
- 0.11% fail on Brake drums
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Leaks
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.11% fail on Lever
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.9% fail on
Suspension
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
(35% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Coil spring
- 0.11% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
(35% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Axles
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Swivel joints/housing (297 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on King pins (466 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.68% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.45% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.23% fail on Suspension rod (50 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
5.7% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
0.23% fail on
View to rear
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
2.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Exhaust system (60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Chassis
(11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Chassis condition (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.23% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.23% fail on Transmission oil leaks (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Headlamps
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.11% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
0.90% fail on
Steering
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.45% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Drag link end
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
0.11% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.79% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.34% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.34% fail on Registration plates
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.23% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Jimny (1998 - 2018)
Outstanding ability off-road. Cute looks, especially as a soft-top. Cheap to buy.