Suzuki Jimny MOT Results
Registered in 200359.1% pass rate
from 2,311 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.043% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.043% fail on Strengthening plate
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Chassis
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Body
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Mounting fixings (56 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Other body component (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Body condition (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Panel
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Tank
- 0.087% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.48% fail on
Cabs
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.35% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Drive shafts
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.043% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.17% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.087% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.087% fail on Joints
-
0.17% fail on
Drive shafts
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.22% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.13% fail on Bracket (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.17% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.043% fail on Safety device
- 0.043% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.13% fail on Floor
-
0.043% fail on
Doors
-
0.043% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.043% fail on Door condition
-
0.043% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.043% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.043% fail on Boot lid condition
-
6.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Axles
(23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Swivel joints/housing (78 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.48% fail on King pins (105 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Stub axle
- 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(39% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
- 0.35% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.087% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (93% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.043% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Springs
(53% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Coil spring (55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.043% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.043% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frames
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.043% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.087% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.043% fail on Other components
-
0.043% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.043% fail on Suspension rod
-
3.9% fail on
Axles
(23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(32% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(34% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(34% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(53% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.087% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(51% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Parking brake performance
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(62% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(32% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.043% fail on Brake linings
-
0.74% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs (60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Brake drums (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Cable
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.95% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.087% fail on Master cylinder (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.087% fail on Valves
- 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.30% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system (74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Pedal
- 0.043% fail on Hand lever
-
0.17% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.087% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.043% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
- 0.043% fail on Other components
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.087% fail on
Parking brake control
(82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Lever (82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Horn
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.043% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Individual direction indicators (46% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.043% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.043% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
9.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(22% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(30% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (34% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.13% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.087% fail on Oxygen sensor (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.087% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.22% fail on
Compression ignition
(79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.043% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.043% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(30% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Fluid leaks
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Transmission oil leaks (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.043% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
- 0.043% fail on Bonnet
-
0.043% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.043% fail on Windscreen
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Requirements
- 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
(53% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Drag link end
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.043% fail on Locking devices
-
0.35% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Other components
- 0.087% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.043% fail on Operation
- 0.043% fail on Pump
- 0.043% fail on Rams
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.043% fail on Steering box
-
0.043% fail on
Steering play
- 0.043% fail on Steering box
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.78% fail on Registration plates
-
0.22% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Jimny (1998 - 2018)
Outstanding ability off-road. Cute looks, especially as a soft-top. Cheap to buy.