Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2002
58.3% pass rate
from 2,241 tests in 2020
(14% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (39% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.22% fail on Brake drums (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Cable
    • 0.80% fail on Load sensing valves (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.045% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.045% fail on Valves
    • 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.045% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.045% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
    • 0.045% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.045% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 14% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Axles (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Swivel joints/housing (88 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on King pins (118 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Axle
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (32% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs (36% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring (37% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.045% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.045% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Suspension arms (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.18% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (27 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.089% fail on Suspension rod (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.045% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.045% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (18% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.089% fail on Tank
      • 0.089% fail on Hose
    • 0.58% fail on Body
      • 0.45% fail on Mounting fixings (54 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Panel
      • 0.089% fail on Other body component
    • 0.54% fail on Cabs (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.36% fail on Floor (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.089% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.089% fail on Joints
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (96% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (96% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.089% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.045% fail on Bracket
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.045% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Horn
      • 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.045% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.49% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.089% fail on Switch
    • 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.045% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.045% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.9% fail on Spark ignition (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (37% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.045% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.045% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition (84% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.045% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.045% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.45% fail on Transmission oil leaks (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.045% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.045% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 6.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Requirements
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility (31% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.089% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.089% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Steering linkage (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Steering component
      • 0.045% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.045% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.98% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.089% fail on Hubs (38 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages