Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 2000
59.6% pass rate
from 1,248 tests in 2020
(14% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Hose
      • 0.080% fail on Tank
    • 1.2% fail on Body (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Mounting fixings (53 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
      • 0.080% fail on Other body component
    • 0.40% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Towbar
      • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.080% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.24% fail on Transmission (94% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.080% fail on Joints
        • 0.080% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.080% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.24% fail on Floor
    • 0.080% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.080% fail on Seats
      • 0.080% fail on Driver's seat
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (51% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.080% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.080% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums (85% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs (84% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.40% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
      • 0.080% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.16% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.080% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.080% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.080% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.080% fail on Leaks
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (28% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.080% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.080% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.080% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.72% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.080% fail on Switch
    • 0.080% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.080% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Axles (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Swivel joints/housing (79 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on King pins (52 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Axle
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.88% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.080% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.72% fail on Springs (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Coil springs (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Coil spring (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.72% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.080% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.080% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.080% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.080% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.080% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 0.80% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.080% fail on Airbags
      • 0.080% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.080% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.080% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.080% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.16% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
      • 0.080% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.080% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.080% fail on Steering box
    • 0.080% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.080% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.080% fail on Steering play
      • 0.080% fail on Steering box
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages