Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.5% pass rate
from 685 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (33% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.58% fail on Horn
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
  • 16% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.73% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Axles (40 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Swivel joints/housing (72 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on King pins (62 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition (73% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Location
    • 0.73% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Front suspension joints (80% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front drive shafts (92% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Constant velocity joints (92% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.15% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.15% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 10% fail on Emissions (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.73% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Cap
      • 0.15% fail on System
  • 14% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.0% fail on Components
        • 6.9% fail on Pipes (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Hoses
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Rear wheels (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.29% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.29% fail on Cable
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (67% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas (81% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.29% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (83% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (61% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (52% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Condition (75% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Free play
        • 0.29% fail on Steering box (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Pump
    • 0.15% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.0% fail on Towbars (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.29% fail on Towbar (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Detachable tow ball (378 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages