Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 1998
52.4% pass rate
from 166 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 13% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.6% fail on Components
        • 8.4% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Hoses
        • 0.60% fail on Valves
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.60% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.6% fail on Emissions
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Axles (25 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Swivel joints/housing (37 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on King pins
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.4% fail on Component mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.60% fail on General condition
    • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.60% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 9.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages