Suzuki Jimny MOT Results

Registered in 1998
53.8% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Axles (17 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Axle
      • 1.1% fail on King pins
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages