Suzuki Jimny MOT Results
Registered in 198966.7% pass rate
from 51 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Jimny is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 3.9% fail on Side repeaters
-
7.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.0% fail on Position lamp
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Hazard warning
- 2.0% fail on Switch
-
2.0% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
7.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 9.8% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Axles
- 2.0% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Seats
- 3.9% fail on Driver's seat (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Drive shaft
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
7.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
7.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
2.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.0% fail on Registration plates