MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2017

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2017
87.0% pass rate
from 6,208 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (68% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Washers
    • 0.048% fail on View to rear
      • 0.048% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Mounting
    • 0.58% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.097% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.016% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.016% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.048% fail on Headlamps (90% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.032% fail on Horn
    • 0.016% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.016% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.016% fail on Side repeaters
  • 0.66% fail on Brakes (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake linings and pads (82% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake pads (82% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums (58% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.064% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.064% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.016% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.016% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.048% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.048% fail on Lever
    • 0.016% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.016% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.097% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.032% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.032% fail on Body
      • 0.032% fail on Other body component
    • 0.016% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.016% fail on Load security
      • 0.016% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.016% fail on Other tailgate component
  • 0.097% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.064% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.032% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.064% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (88% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Exhaust emissions (88% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Spark ignition (79% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.016% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.048% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.048% fail on Attachment
  • 0.032% fail on Identification of the vehicle (84% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Registration plates (84% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.032% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2017 on)
    Distinctive styling. Low running costs. Available with all-wheel drive. Surprisingly spacious rear seats.

    Search Good Garages