Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2006
61.8% pass rate
from 1,583 tests in 2017
(9.5% better than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.9% fail on Coil springs (41% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Location
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Front
    • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.063% fail on Couplings
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (121 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.51% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.063% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.063% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.063% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Component mounting
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Components (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.063% fail on Hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.063% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.063% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.063% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.063% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.063% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (53% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.6% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (48% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (51% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps (39% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (66% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Battery
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamps (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps (93% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Indirect vision devices (44 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type
    • 0.063% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (47% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions (63% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
    • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Free play
        • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.063% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.063% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.19% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN (90% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate (90% worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 0.95% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (47% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 0.32% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (81% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.44% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.063% fail on Body security
    • 0.063% fail on Load security
      • 0.063% fail on Access panel
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages