MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2006

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2006
56.6% pass rate
from 1,323 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (59% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.9% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (52% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.3% fail on Springs (44% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Coil springs (42% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Coil spring (39% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.53% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.076% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.076% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.076% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.076% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.076% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.076% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.076% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.076% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.076% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.076% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.076% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.076% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.076% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.076% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.076% fail on Servos
      • 0.076% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.076% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.076% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.076% fail on Valves
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.076% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.076% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.076% fail on Operation
    • 0.076% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (79% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.076% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.60% fail on Horn
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.23% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.45% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.38% fail on Joints
        • 0.076% fail on Prop shaft
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
      • 0.076% fail on Pipe
    • 0.45% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Sub-frame condition
        • 0.076% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.076% fail on Chassis
      • 0.076% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.076% fail on Doors
      • 0.076% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.076% fail on Door condition
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.23% fail on Compression ignition (84% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.076% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.076% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.076% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.60% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.076% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.076% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.076% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.076% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages