MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2006

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2006
58.5% pass rate
from 1,661 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms (38% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint (64% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Springs (39% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Coil springs (40% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Coil spring (40% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Axles
      • 0.060% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (45% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.54% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (63% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.060% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.96% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.18% fail on Valves (13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Servos
      • 0.060% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.060% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.48% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.060% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
  • 7.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.060% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
        • 0.060% fail on Prop shaft
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.54% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.060% fail on Pipe
      • 0.060% fail on System
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Chassis
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.060% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.060% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.060% fail on Towbar
      • 0.060% fail on Coupling
    • 0.060% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Bracket
    • 0.060% fail on Body
      • 0.060% fail on Other body component
    • 0.060% fail on Doors
      • 0.060% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.060% fail on Door condition
    • 0.060% fail on Seats
      • 0.060% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.060% fail on Cabs
      • 0.060% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.060% fail on Undertray
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.060% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (42% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components (65% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
        • 0.060% fail on Steering component
      • 0.060% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.060% fail on Steering wheel
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition (44% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Catalyst emissions (71% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.060% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (53% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.060% fail on Airbags
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
  • 0.060% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.060% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages