Suzuki Ignis MOT Results
Registered in 200558.1% pass rate
from 2,495 tests in 2017
(6.8% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Condition (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Location
-
5.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.64% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
3.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Front
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.040% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.040% fail on Universal joint
-
2.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.7% fail on
Trailing arms
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (90 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.84% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Shock absorbers
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting (60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.040% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(98% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
0.040% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.040% fail on Condition
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
8.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Pipes (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Cylinders
- 0.080% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.040% fail on Hoses
- 0.44% fail on Leaks
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.24% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Brake performance
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.12% fail on Brake operation
- 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.040% fail on Brake drums
- 0.040% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.4% fail on ABS
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
-
0.080% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.080% fail on
Components
- 0.080% fail on Pipes (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Components
-
0.040% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.040% fail on Cable
-
8.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(39% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Position lamps
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps (35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Rear lamps (68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on All position lamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Direction indicators
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Flashing type
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.40% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Flashing type
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Tell tale
- 0.52% fail on Horn
- 0.40% fail on Battery
- 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.7% fail on
Position lamps
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
- 0.48% fail on Windscreen
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
(24% better than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
- 0.040% fail on Valve stem
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Emissions (57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Cap
- 0.080% fail on Pipe
- 0.040% fail on Hose
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
-
0.28% fail on
Free play
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack
- 0.28% fail on Steering arm
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation
-
0.040% fail on
Steering control
-
0.040% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.040% fail on Universal joint
-
0.040% fail on
Steering coupling
-
0.040% fail on
Power steering
- 0.040% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.040% fail on Locking devices
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.96% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
0.48% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Body condition
- 0.080% fail on Body security
- 0.040% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.040% fail on
Doors
- 0.040% fail on Passengers other
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
- 0.040% fail on Condition
-
0.040% fail on
Towbars
- 0.040% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.