Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.7% pass rate
from 2,432 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.3% fail on Springs (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Coil springs (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Coil spring (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.82% fail on Other suspension component (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.041% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Macpherson strut (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.041% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.041% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.041% fail on Axles
      • 0.041% fail on Axle
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.041% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.041% fail on Linkage
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.041% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.041% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.74% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.082% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.041% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.70% fail on Lever
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.12% fail on Master cylinder (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.082% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.041% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.041% fail on Leaks
    • 0.041% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.041% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.041% fail on Other braking system component
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (28% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (26% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.86% fail on Horn (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.90% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.45% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.041% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (27% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (30% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Joints (30% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.25% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.21% fail on Joints
        • 0.041% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.33% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on System
    • 0.53% fail on Bumpers (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.041% fail on Body condition
      • 0.041% fail on Panel
    • 0.12% fail on Chassis
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.082% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.082% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Bracket
    • 0.082% fail on Doors (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
      • 0.041% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
    • 0.041% fail on Towbar
      • 0.041% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.041% fail on Load security
      • 0.041% fail on Access panel
    • 0.041% fail on Floor
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Driver's view (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering linkage components (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.041% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.25% fail on Steering play
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Operation
      • 0.041% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.041% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.041% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (30% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.041% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.041% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.041% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.58% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.99% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.041% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment
      • 0.041% fail on Requirements
    • 0.041% fail on Airbags
      • 0.041% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages