Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2005
58.1% pass rate
from 2,495 tests in 2017
(6.8% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Coil springs (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Condition (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Location
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.64% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Front
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (34% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front drive shafts (34% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (33% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.040% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.040% fail on Universal joint
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (90 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.84% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Component mounting (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 0.040% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Pipes (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.080% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.040% fail on Hoses
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.040% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.040% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.4% fail on ABS
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
        • 0.040% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.080% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.080% fail on Components
        • 0.080% fail on Pipes (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.040% fail on Cable
  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Battery
    • 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.040% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
      • 0.080% fail on Pipe
      • 0.040% fail on Hose
    • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering system (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Free play
        • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.28% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.16% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.040% fail on Steering control
      • 0.040% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.040% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.040% fail on Power steering
      • 0.040% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.96% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.48% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.040% fail on Requirements
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
  • 0.36% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Body condition
    • 0.080% fail on Body security
    • 0.040% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.040% fail on Doors
      • 0.040% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.040% fail on Condition
  • 0.040% fail on Towbars
    • 0.040% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages