MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2004

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2004
57.1% pass rate
from 1,907 tests in 2021
(7.5% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Suspension arms (48% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Suspension arm (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Springs
      • 4.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (67% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames (81% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.052% fail on Axles
      • 0.052% fail on Axle
    • 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.052% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.052% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.052% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (47% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (72% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.052% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (58% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
        • 0.052% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.58% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
    • 0.42% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (30% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.052% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.31% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
    • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
      • 0.052% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.052% fail on Panel
      • 0.052% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.052% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.052% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.052% fail on Towbar
      • 0.052% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.052% fail on Cabs
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.052% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (38% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.052% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.052% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.052% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.37% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (83% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.052% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.052% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.42% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (31% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.052% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.052% fail on Power steering
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (56% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Requirements
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Airbags
      • 0.052% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages