MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2004

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2004
56.0% pass rate
from 2,777 tests in 2020
(7.0% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.072% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.036% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (28% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp (27% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.036% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.25% fail on Horn
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.036% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.036% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (72% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Springs (33% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Coil springs (32% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring (32% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (43% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers (66% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.036% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.036% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.036% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.036% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (62% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (61% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.072% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance (51% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (52% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.072% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (60% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.072% fail on Pedal
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.036% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.036% fail on Valves
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.072% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.072% fail on Other components
    • 0.036% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.036% fail on Servos
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.25% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
        • 0.072% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.072% fail on Tank
      • 0.036% fail on Pipe
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.18% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.072% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Chassis
      • 0.14% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.072% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.072% fail on Bracket
    • 0.036% fail on Body
      • 0.036% fail on Panel
    • 0.036% fail on Doors
      • 0.036% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
    • 0.036% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.036% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.036% fail on Cabs
      • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.25% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.036% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.22% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.036% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.036% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (26% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (39% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (24% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (37% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.036% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.036% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.036% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.036% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.43% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Steering (29% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.036% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.072% fail on Steering gear (91% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
      • 0.036% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.072% fail on Steering play
      • 0.072% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (58% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Seat belts (40% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Requirements
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Airbags
      • 0.072% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.036% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.036% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages