Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.3% pass rate
from 2,121 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (40% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (31% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (39% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.90% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.094% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.047% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.047% fail on Cable
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.75% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.52% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.094% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (57% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.094% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.047% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.047% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.047% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.047% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp (42% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (53% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators (62% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.094% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.47% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.42% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.094% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.047% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Suspension arms (44% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.94% fail on Suspension arm (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (89% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (53% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs (53% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring (53% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.75% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (83% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.094% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.047% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.047% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.094% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.094% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.047% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.047% fail on Joints
      • 0.047% fail on Belts
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.19% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.047% fail on System
    • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.38% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.094% fail on Chassis (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Chassis condition (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Doors (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.047% fail on Catch
      • 0.047% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
    • 0.047% fail on Body
      • 0.047% fail on Other body component
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Spark ignition (23% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.19% fail on Compression ignition (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.047% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.047% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (40% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components (31% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (39% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.047% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.047% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.047% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.047% fail on Power steering
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts (41% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
      • 0.047% fail on Requirements
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Airbags
      • 0.047% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.094% fail on Condition
    • 0.094% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Ignis (2003 - 2007)
    Perky chain cam engines, good build quality, decent cabin space. High off ground. 4x4 useful cheap transport in rural locations.

    Search Good Garages