Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.7% pass rate
from 1,584 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.063% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
        • 0.063% fail on Lever
        • 0.063% fail on Linkage
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.82% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Valves
      • 0.063% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.063% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.69% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Suspension arms (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.82% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.63% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.063% fail on Axles
      • 0.063% fail on Axle
    • 0.063% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.063% fail on Sub-frame
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.063% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.063% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.063% fail on View to rear
      • 0.063% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.76% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.76% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.76% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Chassis
      • 0.51% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.063% fail on Tank
      • 0.063% fail on Pipe
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
      • 0.063% fail on Panel
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
      • 0.063% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.063% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.063% fail on Load security
      • 0.063% fail on Access panel
    • 0.063% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.063% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (33% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.063% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.063% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.13% fail on Compression ignition (89% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.063% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.063% fail on Other components
        • 0.063% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.063% fail on Power steering
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
    • 0.063% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.063% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.95% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
    • 0.063% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment
  • 0.063% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.063% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages