Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.6% pass rate
from 983 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake linings and pads (60% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.61% fail on Lever
    • 0.61% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.10% fail on Valves
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Springs
      • 2.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.81% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Axle
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.31% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.10% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.61% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.61% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.51% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Chassis
      • 0.10% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's seat
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.10% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.51% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.81% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 0.92% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages