Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.6% pass rate
from 1,879 tests in 2017
(6.4% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Switch
    • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.85% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.053% fail on Switch
    • 0.75% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.37% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Battery (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.053% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.053% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Rear wheels (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.053% fail on Brake operation
    • 8.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Components (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Pipes (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Hoses (77% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Valves
        • 0.16% fail on Cylinders (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.053% fail on Pump
      • 0.53% fail on Leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Parking brake (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components (36% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Wheel cylinder (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.64% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
    • 0.053% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.053% fail on Pedal
        • 0.053% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front
    • 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (46% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Subframe mounting (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.053% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.75% fail on Trailing arms (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (97% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.053% fail on Axles
      • 0.053% fail on Axle beam
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.053% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
    • 0.053% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (31% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Cap
      • 0.053% fail on System
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Free play (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.96% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Body condition
    • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis
    • 0.053% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.053% fail on Seats
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers
  • 0.80% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.053% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.053% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages