MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Ignis » 2000

Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.0% pass rate
from 96 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 9.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Hand lever (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.0% fail on Lever
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 17% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.0% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 6.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
  • 5.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Requirements

Search Good Garages