Suzuki Ignis MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.5% pass rate
from 213 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Ignis is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.47% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.94% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.47% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Components (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Pipes (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Valves
        • 0.47% fail on Hoses
      • 0.47% fail on Leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.47% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Restricted movement
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.94% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.94% fail on Condition (27 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.47% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on System
    • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.94% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.47% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.94% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.47% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.47% fail on Chassis
    • 0.47% fail on Body condition
  • 0.47% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages