Suzuki Grand Vitara MOT Results

Registered in 2009
77.0% pass rate
from 2,198 tests in 2017
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Grand Vitara is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.045% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.14% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.091% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.045% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.27% fail on Battery
    • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.045% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.045% fail on Lamp
    • 0.045% fail on Horn
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.091% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.50% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.091% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
    • 0.23% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.045% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.59% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Location
    • 0.59% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Front drive shafts (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Constant velocity joints (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.091% fail on Rear
      • 0.045% fail on Front
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.045% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.045% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.045% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Size/type
    • 0.045% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.59% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.55% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.045% fail on Requirements
      • 0.045% fail on Installation check
        • 0.045% fail on Anchorage's
      • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.045% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.045% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
  • 0.55% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.045% fail on Pipe
      • 0.045% fail on Cap
    • 0.091% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.045% fail on Emissions
  • 0.45% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.045% fail on Passengers
    • 0.045% fail on Body condition
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Steering system (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.045% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.045% fail on Power steering
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.091% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.091% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages