Suzuki Grand Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 200557.0% pass rate
from 3,354 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Grand Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Coil spring (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Mounting
- 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Linkage
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.69% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.54% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.42% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.030% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.060% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.030% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
(42% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(80% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.030% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.48% fail on
Prop shafts
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.030% fail on Belts
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.089% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.5% fail on
Chassis
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.030% fail on Hose
-
0.36% fail on
Cabs
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.24% fail on Bumpers
-
0.18% fail on
Towbar
(14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Towbar condition (50 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.089% fail on
Seats
- 0.089% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.060% fail on
Body
- 0.030% fail on Body condition
- 0.030% fail on Other body component
-
0.060% fail on
Doors
(88% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.030% fail on Catch
-
0.030% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.030% fail on Door condition
-
0.030% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.060% fail on Floor
-
0.030% fail on
Load security
-
0.030% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.030% fail on Other tailgate component
-
0.030% fail on
Tailgate
-
8.3% fail on
Transmission
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(16% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.089% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.030% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.060% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.030% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.089% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.72% fail on
Parking brake performance
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.72% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.030% fail on Brake linings
-
0.39% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake discs (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.060% fail on Lever
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.54% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system (55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
-
0.24% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.089% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.089% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.060% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.060% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.060% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.030% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.060% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.030% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.060% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.030% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.030% fail on Other leaks
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(51% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Side repeaters (52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.69% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.089% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.18% fail on Position lamp
- 0.030% fail on Switch
-
0.060% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.030% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.030% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
0.060% fail on
View to rear
- 0.060% fail on Mirrors
- 0.030% fail on Driver's view
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(41% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Condition (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Requirements
- 0.030% fail on Attachment
- 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.089% fail on Locking devices
-
0.030% fail on
Other components
- 0.030% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.42% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.030% fail on Rams
- 0.030% fail on Other components
-
0.24% fail on
Steering gear
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Operation
- 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Steering play
- 0.060% fail on Steering rack
- 0.030% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.030% fail on Steering column
-
0.030% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.030% fail on Universal joint
-
0.57% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.75% fail on Registration plates
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
- 0.060% fail on Condition
-
0.030% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.030% fail on
Doors
- 0.030% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.030% fail on
Doors
-
0.030% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.030% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Grand Vitara (2005 - 2014)
Good looking, on road handling much better than previous version, comparatively cheap, impressive off road.