Suzuki Grand Vitara MOT Results
Registered in 200058.1% pass rate
from 442 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Grand Vitara is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.45% fail on Joints
- 0.23% fail on Prop shaft
-
7.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Chassis
- 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.45% fail on Tank
- 0.23% fail on Hose
- 0.68% fail on Bumpers
-
0.68% fail on
Body
- 0.68% fail on Mounting fixings (31 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Other body component
-
0.45% fail on
Cabs
- 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.23% fail on
Doors
-
0.23% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.23% fail on Door condition
-
0.23% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.23% fail on
Seats
- 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
-
7.9% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.90% fail on Ball joint
- 0.45% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.45% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.23% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
- 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.90% fail on Brake pads
-
0.90% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.68% fail on Brake discs
- 0.23% fail on Brake drums
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.68% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.45% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.45% fail on Lever
-
0.45% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.23% fail on Load sensing valves
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(36% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(62% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.90% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.90% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.68% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.68% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.68% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.23% fail on Position lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
7.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
0.23% fail on
View to rear
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
-
7.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.45% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.68% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
- 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
0.90% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.68% fail on Steering rack
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.68% fail on
Steering gear