MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Celerio » 2016

Suzuki Celerio MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.1% pass rate
from 7,963 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Celerio is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Visibility (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.063% fail on View to rear
      • 0.063% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.038% fail on Driver's view (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.025% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Brakes (33% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.050% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.063% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.063% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.69% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake linings and pads (64% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums (71% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.025% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.025% fail on Brake fluid
  • 1.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.025% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.013% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.013% fail on Horn
    • 0.013% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Position lamp
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.34% fail on Suspension (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.063% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.038% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Suspension arms (95% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Suspension arm
  • 0.16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Body
      • 0.013% fail on Panel
    • 0.013% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust emissions (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Spark ignition (81% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.013% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.025% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on Condition
  • 0.025% fail on Identification of the vehicle (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Registration plates (88% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Celerio (2015 - 2019)
    Cheap to buy. Low running costs. Good level of standard equipment. Spacious cabin and boot. Comfortable and easy to drive. Brake problem resolved.

    Search Good Garages