Suzuki Celerio MOT Results
Registered in 201687.1% pass rate
from 7,963 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Celerio is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Visibility
(84% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Washers
-
0.063% fail on
View to rear
- 0.063% fail on Mirrors
- 0.038% fail on Driver's view (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.025% fail on Windscreen
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
(52% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Size/type
-
1.9% fail on
Brakes
(33% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.050% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.013% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.013% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
-
0.063% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.063% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.063% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.69% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake pads (63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.025% fail on Lever
-
0.58% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake control
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.16% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.025% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.72% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp aim
(33% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.62% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Headlamps
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Direction indicators
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Flashing type
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.038% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.025% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.013% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.013% fail on Horn
-
0.013% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.013% fail on Position lamp
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp aim
(33% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Attachment
- 0.038% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Suspension
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.013% fail on Linkage
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.063% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.038% fail on
Springs
(97% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Bumpers
-
0.038% fail on
Transmission
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Body
- 0.013% fail on Panel
-
0.013% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Spark ignition
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.013% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.013% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.088% fail on
Spark ignition
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.063% fail on Attachment
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.025% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Registration plates (88% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Celerio (2015 - 2019)
Cheap to buy. Low running costs. Generous standard equipment. Spacious cabin and boot. Easy to drive.