Suzuki Celerio MOT Results

Registered in 2015
87.0% pass rate
from 7,425 tests in 2020
(16% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Celerio is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Visibility (88% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Washers
    • 0.067% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamps (83% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.081% fail on Horn
      • 0.027% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.094% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (78% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Position lamps (69% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Position lamp (68% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.027% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.013% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.013% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Size/type
    • 0.027% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.5% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (70% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.081% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.027% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.013% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.53% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake linings and pads (70% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Brake pads (71% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.027% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Brake discs (92% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.027% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.027% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.013% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 0.44% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (59% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.054% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Transmission
      • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.054% fail on Joints
    • 0.040% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.027% fail on Body
      • 0.013% fail on Panel
      • 0.013% fail on Other body component
    • 0.013% fail on Undertray
  • 0.16% fail on Suspension (88% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.054% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.013% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.081% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Exhaust emissions (86% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.027% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.067% fail on Identification of the vehicle (70% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Registration plates (70% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.040% fail on Road Wheels (75% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Attachment
    • 0.013% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Celerio (2015 - 2019)
    Cheap to buy. Low running costs. Good level of standard equipment. Spacious cabin and boot. Comfortable and easy to drive. Brake problem resolved.

    Search Good Garages