Suzuki Celerio MOT Results

Registered in 2015
86.0% pass rate
from 7,315 tests in 2021
(27% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Celerio is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (48% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (85% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.027% fail on View to rear
      • 0.027% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.014% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.014% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.014% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (98% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.055% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Horn
      • 0.027% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.082% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.055% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.5% fail on Brakes (29% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (86% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.041% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.67% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake linings and pads (70% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs and drums (73% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake discs (73% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.014% fail on Cable
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pedal
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (48% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Size/type
  • 0.41% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts (88% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements
    • 0.055% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.37% fail on Suspension (89% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.041% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.082% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.027% fail on Suspension arms (97% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.014% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.26% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.068% fail on Body
      • 0.041% fail on Other body component
      • 0.027% fail on Panel
    • 0.041% fail on Transmission (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.014% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.014% fail on Tank
    • 0.014% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.014% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.014% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust emissions (84% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Catalyst emissions (63% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.027% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.041% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.041% fail on Road Wheels (82% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Attachment (76% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.027% fail on Identification of the vehicle (87% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Registration plates (87% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Celerio (2015 - 2019)
    Cheap to buy. Low running costs. Good level of standard equipment. Spacious cabin and boot. Comfortable and easy to drive. Brake problem resolved.

    Search Good Garages