Suzuki Celerio MOT Results
Registered in 201586.0% pass rate
from 7,315 tests in 2021
(27% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Celerio is unusually good or bad.
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (85% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers
-
0.027% fail on
View to rear
- 0.027% fail on Mirrors
- 0.014% fail on Driver's view
-
0.014% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.014% fail on Windscreen
-
3.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (98% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Headlamp aim
(39% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.055% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.19% fail on
Headlamps
(82% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.027% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.082% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.055% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.014% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.014% fail on Switch
- 0.014% fail on Rear reflectors
-
2.5% fail on
Brakes
(29% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.66% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.041% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
(79% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
(86% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
(86% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.041% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.66% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.67% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake discs (73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.014% fail on Cable
-
0.55% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(170% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Pedal
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake control
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.014% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Size/type
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
(88% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Requirements
- 0.055% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
(88% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Suspension
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.041% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.082% fail on
Springs
(95% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Coil springs
(95% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.027% fail on
Suspension arms
(97% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.014% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Bumpers
-
0.068% fail on
Body
- 0.041% fail on Other body component
- 0.027% fail on Panel
-
0.041% fail on
Transmission
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Joints (88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.014% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.014% fail on Tank
-
0.014% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.014% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.014% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.014% fail on Bracket
-
0.014% fail on
Seats
- 0.014% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(81% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Catalyst emissions (63% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.027% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.014% fail on Other leaks
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Steering
(90% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Locking devices
-
0.041% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Road Wheels
(82% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Attachment (76% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(87% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Registration plates (87% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Celerio (2015 - 2019)
Cheap to buy. Low running costs. Generous standard equipment. Spacious cabin and boot. Easy to drive.