Suzuki Cappuccino MOT Results
Registered in 199565.4% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Cappuccino is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
- 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 1.3% fail on Linkage
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
2.6% fail on
Springs
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.6% fail on Coil spring
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.6% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
5.1% fail on
Chassis
- 5.1% fail on Chassis condition
-
3.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.6% fail on Floor (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Pipe
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.3% fail on Pedal
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Horn
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
-
6.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.3% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth