Suzuki Baleno MOT Results

Registered in 2016
90.7% pass rate
from 1,968 tests in 2020
(30% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Baleno is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.051% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.051% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (32% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Brakes
    • 0.76% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake linings and pads (53% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Brake pads (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.71% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.051% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.051% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.051% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.051% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.051% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.051% fail on Horn
  • 0.30% fail on Suspension
    • 0.10% fail on Springs
      • 0.10% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.10% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.051% fail on Panel
      • 0.051% fail on Other body component
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.051% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.051% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.051% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.051% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.051% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.051% fail on Condition
  • 0.051% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.051% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Baleno (2016 - 2019)
    Punchy and efficient petrol engines especially the 1.0-litre Boosterjet, excellent value for money – even the top trim is well priced, more spacious and practical than the Suzuki Swift.

    Search Good Garages