Suzuki Baleno MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.3% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Baleno is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.1% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Sub-frame (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.3% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.3% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.3% fail on Bumpers
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Requirements
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages