Suzuki Baleno MOT Results

Registered in 1998
48.8% pass rate
from 123 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Baleno is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.7% fail on Sub-frames (15 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (30 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.81% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.4% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.81% fail on Front
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.81% fail on Front lamps
    • 0.81% fail on Battery
    • 0.81% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.81% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.81% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.81% fail on Lamp
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 6.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.81% fail on Valves
      • 0.81% fail on Operation
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.81% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.3% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Passengers other
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.81% fail on Seats
      • 0.81% fail on Drivers
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
  • 4.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.81% fail on Steering
    • 0.81% fail on Locking devices

Search Good Garages