Suzuki Baleno MOT Results

Registered in 1997
64.9% pass rate
from 37 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Baleno is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 14% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Joints
    • 8.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 8.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.7% fail on Seats
      • 2.7% fail on Driver's seat
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.7% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages