Suzuki Alto MOT Results
Registered in 201579.2% pass rate
from 1,880 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.
-
6.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.74% fail on
Electrical equipment
(6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.37% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.11% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.11% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.053% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.053% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.053% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.053% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.053% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.053% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.053% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.053% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.053% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
(63% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (85% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Washers
-
0.053% fail on
View to rear
- 0.053% fail on Mirrors
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Ball joint
- 0.053% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.053% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.053% fail on
Springs
-
0.053% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.053% fail on Mounting
-
0.053% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.053% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.053% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(190% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
(31 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Front passenger's door
(52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Door condition (55 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Driver's door
(50 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Door condition (57 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Other passenger's door
(7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Front passenger's door
(52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Transmission
-
0.74% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Bumpers
-
0.053% fail on
Body
- 0.053% fail on Other body component
-
0.053% fail on
Seats
- 0.053% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
(31 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brakes
(61% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake pads (73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.053% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.053% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.053% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.053% fail on Hand lever
- 0.053% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.053% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.053% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.64% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.053% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.053% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.37% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates
- 0.053% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.053% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.053% fail on
Steering
-
0.053% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.053% fail on Locking devices
-
0.053% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Suzuki Alto (2009 - 2015)
Cute little small hatch clone offering low emissions, low tax, good fuel economy and a proper 4-speed automatic option. Decent to drive.