MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Suzuki » Alto » 2010

Suzuki Alto MOT Results

Registered in 2010
65.7% pass rate
from 4,843 tests in 2021
(7.5% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.021% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.021% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.062% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.062% fail on Position lamp
  • 9.6% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (22% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.041% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.041% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.021% fail on Cable
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.39% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.041% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.021% fail on Valves
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.083% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.021% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.021% fail on Other components
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.10% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.041% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.041% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.5% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (26% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Axles
      • 0.17% fail on Axle (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.062% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.041% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.041% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Transmission (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts (44% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Joints (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.041% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.041% fail on Joints
    • 0.50% fail on Doors (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's door (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Catch
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
      • 0.062% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Seats
      • 0.041% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.041% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.062% fail on Body
      • 0.041% fail on Other body component
      • 0.021% fail on Body condition
    • 0.041% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.041% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.041% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.041% fail on Fuel system (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Hose
      • 0.021% fail on Pipe
    • 0.021% fail on Chassis
      • 0.021% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.021% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Bracket
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.062% fail on Compression ignition (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.083% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.083% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment
  • 0.52% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.021% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.021% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.021% fail on Steering play
      • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.27% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.27% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.041% fail on Attachment (88% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.021% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.021% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

  • Suzuki Alto (2009 - 2015)
    Cute little small hatch clone offering low emissions, low tax, good fuel economy and a proper 4-speed automatic option. Decent to drive.

    Search Good Garages