Suzuki Alto MOT Results
Registered in 200239.6% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.9% fail on Joints
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.9% fail on
Doors
-
1.9% fail on
Driver's door
- 1.9% fail on Door condition
-
1.9% fail on
Driver's door
-
13% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
26% fail on
Suspension
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.9% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt
- 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt
-
7.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.5% fail on
Service brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 5.7% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
7.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 7.5% fail on Wipers
- 5.7% fail on Washers
-
9.4% fail on
Tyres
- 5.7% fail on Condition
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.7% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts