Suzuki Alto MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.0% pass rate
from 100 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 8.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 8.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.0% fail on Rear
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
    • 9.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.0% fail on Components
        • 9.0% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
      • 2.0% fail on Leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.0% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 7.0% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Passengers front (27 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Drivers (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages