Suzuki Alto MOT Results

Registered in 2000
43.5% pass rate
from 62 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Alto is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Body, chassis, structure (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Front passenger's door (45 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Door condition (46 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Driver's door (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Door condition (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Panel
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.6% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.2% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.6% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 11% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 8.1% fail on Wipers
    • 8.1% fail on Washers
  • 13% fail on Tyres
    • 9.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.8% fail on Condition
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages